Sure to be controversial. This is from the Art History Blog. The industrious author (god bless him) went to the trouble of trying to make sense of the new NRC grad program rankings. Basically, he just averaged the two different ranking categories in order to create numbers for a single ranking. The original list was complex (and all prospective grad students should refer to it, as it provides a lot of interesting data about length to degree, financial aid, etc.) I should also add that this is based more on objective data than the old 'reputational rankings,' where they just ask people what are the best programs in the field.

It helps to eliminate the ones that are resting on their laurels. By 1 September 2011 , I just discovered that the NRC its rankings back in April after discovering errors in its data. So, I should go back and revise the findings of. Another thing about this list in particular, or rather the source material from which it was culled, is that by the time the data got published it was already out of date. One could potentially argue that Berkeley, with the recent departure of TJ Clark and his wife Anne Wagner, as well as the overall mayhem in the University of California, has lost some of its standing, whereas the University of Chicago has been continuously expanding its offerings with some of the brightest and freshest people out there. Similarly, Yale has lost Alex Nemerov. The Philosophy Of Iso Is Based On The Key Principles here.

Of course, most of these switches are being made up for somehow, but not always. Since the job carousel is turning perpetually, these lists are nothing more than historical snapshots, but rarely reliable tools to plan the future. Hospital Waste Management System Pdf there. Kind of surprising to see the tech school MIT ahead of Cornell and Stanford.

But other than that, it pretty much the schools which always win. However, I think we should move away from these national rankings. Higher education is international these days. And I want to know how these schools compare to Oxford, Cambridge, Munich. MIT has an excellent Architecture History, Theory & Criticism PhD - so that could be why back in 2011 it was up there. I don't think an international equivalent exists, but you might find this useful for UK History of Art Programs: There's also always the more general Times Higher Education rankings and others with a similar focus on the Universities as a whole and their research output, student experience etc.